Onyeachonam,
who is also known as “Fizzy,” because of his love for fizzy alcoholic
drinks, is said to have defrauded vulnerable pensioners via the lottery
scam of £30 Million over the course of seven years, according to Daily Mail.
Following a three-week trial, he was charged with ” conspiracy to defraud.”
His accomplices in the UK: Bernard Armah, 51, and Lawrencia Emenyonu, 38, were also found guilty of money laundering, and have been sentenced to an 8-month and 18-month jail term respectively.
They have all denied the charges.
Onyeachonam, who is a married father of two, reportedly targeted people who were “crippled, old or poor.’
How the scams were conducted
This is how the scam, known as ‘advance fee’ fraud was carried out:
Using an alias, Onyeachonam would send
victims an e-mail, informing them that they had won the Australian
lottery. He would then instruct them to call him on the phone. He would
subsequently urge them to send him money so he could release the lottery
funds.
The fake lottery winnings ranged from £2 million to £9 million.
Once they sent the cash, victims were roped into the continuous scam.
What investigations uncovered
Investigations
were led by the UK’s National Crime Agency in collaboration with the
Postal Inspection Service and Internal Revenue Service in the U.S.
The investigators were able to trace 14
victims who were predominantly from the U.S, and one from the UK,
whom Onyeachonam allegedly defrauded of £900,000.
According to reports, evidence indicates that he had over 400 victims whom he extorted around a total of £30 million from.
Onyeachonam
is reportedly considered to be the key suspect in the UK , but police
say a criminal network may have been in place in several countries
around the world.
Authorities
also discovered an alleged co-conspirator abroad, who had an email
containing the details of more than 100,000 potential victims.
Status of the case
The prosecution is said to be advocating for a confiscation hearing for Onyeachonam.
A confiscation order is
“an order that a convicted defendant pay a certain sum of money
representing the defendant’s benefits from crime to the Crown. The
order does not, as may be thought, “confiscate” or require the surrender
of a particular asset or assets.”
Photo Credit: PA/National News & Pictures/Daily Mail
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
DON'T JUST READ DROP YOUR COMMENT.
Kindly help Share this information with all your friends and family on Facebook or Twitter, they will appreciate it. Click on any of the Share buttons Below to share now Thanks